From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 28 10:27:58 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C112D37B401; Wed, 28 May 2003 10:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B43C943F93; Wed, 28 May 2003 10:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee)
Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.12.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h4SHMtBA049361;
	Wed, 28 May 2003 20:22:56 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee)
Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost)h4SHMt1Q049357;
	Wed, 28 May 2003 20:22:55 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 20:22:55 +0300 (EEST)
From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To: Don Lewis <truckman@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200305280239.h4S2dVM7090522@gw.catspoiler.org>
Message-ID: <20030528202029.F40030-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: julian@elischer.org
Subject: Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:27:59 -0000


On Tue, 27 May 2003, Don Lewis wrote:

> On 27 May, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > For the last month (more actually)(and after completely rebuilding my
> > system and all the ports on it) I have not been able to compile
> > the openoffice port due to gcc failures.
> > (I have posted the message earlier several times)
> > Has anyone been able to compile the openoffice port recently?
> >
> > somewhere in it's private compilation of mozilla (why does it do that? I
> > already have mozilla running?) gcc (doing c++) has a heart attach and
> > keels over dead.
>
> I think the reason to make the build take longer.  Lots of fun on 400
> MHz PII.
>

the mozilla addresbook <-> OOo integration part of OOo needs a patch
that continues suffer the sad fate of many uncomitted mozilla patches. if
you change the main mozilla port to use it, you could just use the main
one and no longer need the separate build.