From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 10:08:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B04F16A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.speakeasy.net (mail1.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1335943D68 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:07:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 9201 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2004 18:07:44 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 16 Jan 2004 18:07:44 -0000 Received: from 10.50.40.206 (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0GI7dM0088111; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:07:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: obrien@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:08:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401120837.i0C8bWk2077213@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040115083715.GA79312@FreeBSD.org.ua> <20040116161541.GA8293@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040116161541.GA8293@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401161128.06581.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: Makoto Matsushita cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:08:04 -0000 On Friday 16 January 2004 11:15 am, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:37:15AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > You didn't get it. It's possible to have a RELENG_4 box (with > > RELENG_4 /usr/src and /usr/obj matching the running version), > > and build a release snapshot of HEAD. > > This is WAY not officially supported! > > - echo "/etc/rc.d/ldconfig start" >> ${_MK} > + echo "if [ -f /etc/rc.d/ldconfig ]; then" >> ${_MK} > + echo " /etc/rc.d/ldconfig start" >> ${_MK} > + echo "else" >> ${_MK} > + echo " ldconfig /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib" >> ${_MK} > + echo "fi" >> ${_MK} > > I object to yet more offuscation being committed to src/release/Makefile. > If you want to build a snapshot of HEAD, run a -CURRENT box. Things are > getting messier and messier for 4->5 "support". When this issue was brought to the TRB, it more or less decided (there wasn't a formal vote, more of a consensus) that 4.x -> HEAD releases on the same arch can be supported. As another person who works on the release Makefile, I don't find this change too obfuscating. I know that you don't agree with what the TRB consensus, but at some point you just need to accept it and stop complaining about it every time it pops up. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org