From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 27 10:34:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E719737B401 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 10:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MX4.estpak.ee (ld1.estpak.ee [194.126.101.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC32E43F85 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 10:34:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from kevad.internal (80-235-39-49-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.39.49]) by MX4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7697C1D0059; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:34:35 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by kevad.internal (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3RHYH6W038570; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:34:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from vallo) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:34:14 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Wesley Morgan Message-ID: <20030427173414.GA20023@kevad.internal> References: <20030427135506.GA1625@kevad.internal> <20030427102416.C41722@volatile.chemikals.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030427102416.C41722@volatile.chemikals.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libthr broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:34:44 -0000 On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 10:26:47AM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > Does anybody really use libthr? It's broken for me, as long as I > > remember. The real application which best shows off is KNode, just > > jump into some big binaries group and start sniffing around. > > Download some pictures as fast as you can click and watch in a row, > > then stop some downloads and it'll die. But only if the threading > > library is libthr. I believe this isn't KNode's fault as it was for > > long time in KDE 2.x series. > > Maybe I'm confused, but I believe libthr has been in the tree for less > than a month. Give it a break! Maybe you mean pthread, which has also been > updated quite a bit lately. I mean libthr and yes, I know, it's even not installed by default. Besides that, this new library was said to be snap-in replacement for libc_r and considered to work with KDE and Mozilla. No problem, of course, I'm sharing my experiences only, no more no less. -- Vallo Kallaste