From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 22 7:58:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from tornado.cisco.com (tornado.cisco.com [171.69.104.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD3D10E64 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 07:57:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmcgover@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com) Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (bmcgover-pc.cisco.com [171.69.104.147]) by tornado.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id KAA26492 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 10:57:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (localhost.pa.dtd.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA10051 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 10:57:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bmcgover@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com) Message-Id: <199902221557.KAA10051@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: HOW TO QUESTION: 'Flagging' characters in t_outq.... Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 10:57:51 -0500 From: Brian McGovern Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have just finished a line discipline that does packet framing. I tried using the upper bits on the int to do start and end of packet framing, following the lead of the input side (for things like parity errors, etc). However, it appears that only the TTY_QUOTE bit seems to get passed (having looked at the code). I'd really like to know if/why the other bits get stripped, and if there is a way around this, so I can get the full number of bits passed down..... Comments? -Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message