From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 22 09:08:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93A516A47A; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:08:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D8B43D53; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (proxy8.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.4/y.out) with ESMTP id k5M96vhI047906; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 02:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:18:39 +0800 Message-ID: From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20060621181745.S35462@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060619115827.A25435@wonkity.com> <20060621155727.E8526@fledge.watson.org> <20060621170045.GB15163@soaustin.net> <20060621181745.S35462@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (i386-apple-darwin8.6.1) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creation of a new list for Embedded.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:08:33 -0000 At Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:18:21 +0100 (BST), rwatson wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > well, the question is, do discussions about picobsd, nanobsd, etc., which > > may not be intended for what I would consider "embedded systems", move over > > as well? > > > > If so, IMHO there ought to be one list. I can see arguments for either > > choice. > > I think centralizing discussions on this one list make sense also, at least > until such time as it's clear there's enough traffic to justify breaking it > out. In terms of subject matter small and embedded should be identical. If core@ or rwatson@ want to have postmaster move people over then that's fine, but I'm not wearing any asbestos briefs so... Later, George