From owner-cvs-all Wed Apr 1 18:51:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA02013 for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 18:51:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA02000 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 18:51:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA01181; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 21:51:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 21:51:42 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Eivind Eklund cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en/handbook handbook.sgml README In-Reply-To: <19980402014605.25591@follo.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > I disagree. .sgml _is_ de facto standard for a document marked up in > SGML. Processing should depend on what kind of SGML document is > inside, which is easy to determine. Both DocBook and LinuxDoc is > SGML, and thus both should end in .sgml. On the one hand, different extensions does make writing Makefiles easiers if you have a mixed collection. On the other, I eagerly await the day when linuxdoc is but a distant memory, and while there is a mix, it is easy enough so specify the DTD in the particular Makefile. If you look through naming conventions of my personal files, you will quickly conclude that I have no consistent opinion or practice on this issue. :) -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message