Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 21:51:42 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en/handbook handbook.sgml README Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980401214645.357B-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <19980402014605.25591@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > I disagree. .sgml _is_ de facto standard for a document marked up in > SGML. Processing should depend on what kind of SGML document is > inside, which is easy to determine. Both DocBook and LinuxDoc is > SGML, and thus both should end in .sgml. On the one hand, different extensions does make writing Makefiles easiers if you have a mixed collection. On the other, I eagerly await the day when linuxdoc is but a distant memory, and while there is a mix, it is easy enough so specify the DTD in the particular Makefile. If you look through naming conventions of my personal files, you will quickly conclude that I have no consistent opinion or practice on this issue. :) -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980401214645.357B-100000>