From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 28 11:24:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C278106566B for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 11:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f212.google.com (mail-ew0-f212.google.com [209.85.219.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD048FC1A for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 11:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so1771067ewy.43 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:24:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IGyyFkplk9vdaBChd+LNF3UogfLEx4ONeSvsj1x+JuI=; b=sMOoQ1PR2V1BMQM9wmPXThiOAMq8wTwlTXZSskz+BcTkDeTPyD5Mq7cZRCs9PhBx9V H9msl2WkL/WOcnjo9AgBCdh6rLMkeDb3kTZPJisQ/NYWEHKIRfO5YerhtkdnKk8uSPxv plKjL/gupYiCv4K7+/RatMzpxrk1U5Hg36d7w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=b5VVoZalEKh1lTjIqduXNLuZkw5D4anKINx2oDyTCQnemZ1WHFor8fBWyITEKFbE/B XfJJyj97sMg71Q66bYaJGlYuxtoGUlpQmM6XgwiLqK6T0OhEY9S8EfnUNJhGPv4EyJ06 bJIZw+Ec/EFk34xGj6tk7ywemw0yQ25DLWocQ= Received: by 10.210.141.19 with SMTP id o19mr530053ebd.54.1243509873793; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm8150969eyg.34.2009.05.28.04.24.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 28 May 2009 04:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:24:30 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090528122430.729c83a9@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200905280749.12509.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <20090527224351.1e94029b@bobcat.edu> <20090527205610.GA22384@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090528021346.54c91917@gumby.homeunix.com> <200905280749.12509.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: removing distfiles? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 11:24:35 -0000 On Thu, 28 May 2009 07:49:12 +0200 Mel Flynn wrote: > On Thursday 28 May 2009 03:13:46 RW wrote: > > On Wed, 27 May 2009 22:56:10 +0200 > > > > Roland Smith wrote: > > > Using e.g. 'portmaster --clean-distfiles-all' only removes those > > > distfiles that do not belong to installed ports. > > > > I've not used it myself, but there is also a shell script called > > distviper in bsdadminscripts which supports both of distclean's > > modes without the ruby dependence. > > What ruby dependence in portmaster? He said portMASTER not > portUPGRADE. I wrote: "supports both of distclean's modes without the ruby dependence". Portmaster only supports one of the modes, distclean has a ruby dependence.