From owner-freebsd-net Mon Feb 22 17:29: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AA1119CA for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 17:28:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA12363; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:28:33 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199902230128.WAA12363@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: IP frags from wcarchive ??? In-Reply-To: <36D20337.2C1AA00E@softweyr.com> from Wes Peters at "Feb 22, 1999 6:24: 7 pm" To: wes@softweyr.com (Wes Peters) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:28:33 -0300 (EST) Cc: jonny@jonny.eng.br, net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org #define quoting(Wes Peters) // Unless you have absolute control of the routing path, you're highly // likely to encounter one or more routers that are broken with respect // to path mtu discovery. What would you suggest to my firewall, then ? Allow TCP fragment packets, even without knowing its port endpoints ? Is this completely safe ? Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro "This .sig is not meant to be politically correct." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message