From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 17 09:00:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA17041 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:00:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailbox1.ucsd.edu (mailbox1.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA16989 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 16:00:36 GMT (envelope-from dennis@coast.ucsd.edu) Received: from coast.ucsd.edu (coast.ucsd.edu [132.239.117.5]) by mailbox1.ucsd.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA11935; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dennis@localhost) by coast.ucsd.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA27818; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:00:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Dennis Fetterly To: Malte Lance cc: Gary Algier , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who's Broken: Sun or FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19980417113618.00752b2c@cyclone.degnet.baynet.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm under the impression that if you add virtual interfaces under Solaris 2.6, all packets will be broadcast from the interface that was added last. If you don't have 2 physical interpaces in the Sun, this could be the cause of the problem. This was discussed on the solaris-x86 mailing list, you can search the list archives at http://fishbutt.fiver.net/Excite/AT-solaris_x86query.html for virtual interfaces to find out more. -Dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message