From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 7 05:50:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4884F16A4DE for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D051F43D49 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:50:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1G9y0m-0004eW-Lp for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:50:48 +0400 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1G9y1O-00075H-ME for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:51:26 +0400 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k775pQqO027234 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:51:26 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:51:26 +0400 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060807055126.GA27084@sysadm.stc> References: <44D14C43.10957.1C8B605A@rabing.omc.net> <20060803001240.41813.qmail@web34508.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <72cf361e0608051235n5c0e70fobc6f6caad8eeec69@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <72cf361e0608051235n5c0e70fobc6f6caad8eeec69@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: 4TB filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:50:51 -0000 On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:35:31PM +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote: > Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and > unclean umount..... Background fsck does not work well with big filesystems, it can literaly make server useless for long period of time, sometimes I just boot server in single user mode and do "fsck -y" because while it means downtime, but after this downtime server will work ... while background fsck eats all server memory and most of CPU. I'm very happy, that I dont need do this often :-)