Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:43:19 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Christopher Key <cjk32@cam.ac.uk> Subject: Re: OPTIONS Message-ID: <864od08oqg.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinkasFFQ8ssbTSdbYUS%2BJ-tYMc1U3w9rkUCk9Gd@mail.gmail.com> (David DEMELIER's message of "Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:22:46 %2B0200") References: <4C93AA31.5080202@DataIX.net> <AANLkTik%2B1rvY4ZYgzHRjaX8PBfD1UqNCNeadHqg3KBfo@mail.gmail.com> <20100918223933.GB85995@dragon.NUXI.org> <AANLkTi=vPKpaPL9L=pQN9EdWdEN3sf1pos6uGtJU7ybV@mail.gmail.com> <20101002002605.GA8018@dragon.NUXI.org> <AANLkTinkasFFQ8ssbTSdbYUS%2BJ-tYMc1U3w9rkUCk9Gd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> writes: > 2010/10/2 David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org>: >> 4. When I build misc/mc-light and have "WITHOUT_NLS=yes" in >> /etc/make.conf, why does the OPTIONS dialog offer me >> "[X] NLS Enable gettext support" instead of defaulting the >> dialog to unchecked? >> > > I agree with this inconsistency, I think with a little of work OPTIONS > framework should be to follow KNOB to enable an option if it's already > defined by the user. This would be great for people that use > WITHOUT_GNOME, WITHOUT_X11 and so on. I think it's possible to do it. I think Chris solved this one in the thread http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C476F69.1060200
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864od08oqg.fsf>