From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 13:01:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C788216A41F for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:01:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8B343D70 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.71.31]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0INZ00JANQTQMLYD@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 08:01:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:01:05 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <434646C9.9090105@gmail.com> To: Mark Cullen Message-id: <43467191.2090902@mac.com> Organization: The Courts of Chaos MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: <434646C9.9090105@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Cc: "Brian E. Conklin" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Converting from IPFW to IPFILTER X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:01:08 -0000 Mark Cullen wrote: > Charles Swiger wrote: [ ... ] >> If you're going to switch to using IPF, you might want to consider >> upgrading or reinstalling the OS to 5.4 instead of 4.11. > > Are there any particular reasons why you suggest switching from 4.11 to > 5.4 if going from IPFW to IPF? Because I have just converted from IPFW2 > to IPF on 4.11-STABLE... > > I did notice that IPF appears to be a rather old version. 3.something, > where the latest version of IPF is 4.something. Is this the reason? Sort of. IPF was added to FreeBSD-5 and then backported ("MFC'ed") to the later 4.x releases. I don't know of any specific problems with IPF under 4.11. Because of the significant differences in SMP and locking between 4.x and 5.x some of the work and fixes done to improve using IPF and IPFW in combination may not be applicable to 4.x, nevertheless, I would recommend using IPF with 5.x given the choice. -- -Chuck