From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Nov 4 06:33:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA02497 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 06:33:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA02492 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 06:33:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA05459; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 06:31:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Jeremy Lea cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: On advocating FreeBSD and the Halloween memo... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Nov 1998 23:49:33 +0200." <19981103234933.A19042@shale.csir.co.za> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 06:31:42 -0800 Message-ID: <5456.910189902@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Something that really concerns me is the Linux advocates myth, > perpetuated by this memo, that FreeBSD is a closed development project. For as long as it's up, please point anyone suffering from this myth at: http://www.performance-computing.com/features/9810of1.shtml Not blowing my own horn here, but I did cover this exact topic in my article. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message