From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 01:37:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE9F16A41F for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:37:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timur@com.bat.ru) Received: from mail.bat.ru (dzokonda.xs4all.nl [194.109.164.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF6443D45 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:37:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timur@com.bat.ru) Received: from timur.home.bat.ru ([192.168.0.4] verified) by mail.bat.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 590920; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:40:51 +0100 Received: (from timur@localhost) by timur.home.bat.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBE1bFeE002300; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:37:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from timur) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:37:15 +0100 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" To: Jose M Rodriguez Message-ID: <20051214013715.GA2267@com.bat.ru> References: <438085BF.9090708@gmail.com> <200512131118.09128.josemi@redesjm.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <200512131118.09128.josemi@redesjm.local> User-Agent: mutt-ng devel (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Moving samba ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:37:20 -0000 On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:18:08AM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: >=20 > El Domingo, 20 de Noviembre de 2005 15:18, Dennis Olvany escribi?: > > This package should depend on samba3, I think. Getting samba2 to work > > with cups is problematic at best. Samba3 is a breeze... a walk in the > > park... i.e. It actually works. Samba2 does not seems to work with a > > cups url like smb://guest@server/printer. > > > I think we must now move >=20 > net/samba -> net/samba2 That could make things more clear, agree. > net/samba3 -> net/samba No, that has no use. I have samba4 in my tree and hope it'll hit ports a bit later, so I'd preffer to stick to numbered versions of ports. Well, another question is that samba4 maybe called samba4-devel meanwhile... But not sure. > Or make net/samba3 the default samba port in all dependencies Agree on that, dunno why it's not default yet ;) With best regards, Timur Bakeyev.