From owner-freebsd-current Tue Feb 20 19:42:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA77F37B401 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:42:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p06-dn02kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.71]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id MAA15294; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:42:32 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3A933882.212928AF@newsguy.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:39:46 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Akinori MUSHA Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Craig Carey Subject: Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex References: <8666i588p4.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <5.0.2.1.2.20010221083646.03aaf540@pop.qsi.net.nz> <863dd981ed.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > > I would object if it is a new variant of regexp. I'd say it ought > > be between egrep and perl, in its functionality. ... > > - Perl's regexp is known to be a unique variant that is different > from the "basic regexp" nor the "extended regexp" ;P For that matter, anyone talking about "standard" regexp of any kind I invite to take a look at the include file for gnu regexp, to see just how many slightly different variants of regexp there are out there in various utilities. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.fashionable.bsdconspiracy.net "Too bad sentience isn't a marketable commodity." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message