From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 12 21:30:02 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5A7EA16A4CE; Thu, 12 May 2005 21:30:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lakermmtao10.cox.net (lakermmtao10.cox.net [68.230.240.29])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5F37A43D6E; Thu, 12 May 2005 21:30:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gandalf@digital.net)
Received: from [192.168.1.94] (really [68.0.104.119])
          by lakermmtao10.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050512212959.UZLM7787.lakermmtao10.cox.net@[192.168.1.94]>;
          Thu, 12 May 2005 17:29:59 -0400
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.6.040913.0
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:29:59 -0500
From: Gandalf The White <gandalf@digital.net>
To: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <BEA93507.1B3D1%gandalf@digital.net>
In-Reply-To: <52F4D230-9D2D-4D75-93DC-FF54BB902D98@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and the Rose Attack / NewDawn
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:30:02 -0000

Greetings and Salutations:

On 5/8/05 9:13 PM, "Suleiman Souhlal" <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> The patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/testing/
> ip_reass-20050507.diff does just this.
> Could you kindly test it?

My procedure (as root of course):
# cd \usr
# patch ip_reass-20050507.diff
Recompile kernel

I ran:
# top

I ran the test again and CPU utilization was at close to 98% to 99% in the
interrupt column.

Ken

---------------------------------------------------------------
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards for they are subtle and
quick to anger.
Ken Hollis - Gandalf The White - gandalf@digital.net - O- TINLC
WWW Page - http://digital.net/~gandalf/
Trace E-Mail forgery - http://digital.net/~gandalf/spamfaq.html
Trolls crossposts - http://digital.net/~gandalf/trollfaq.html