From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr  8 17:55:23 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA15979
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 17:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA15973
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 17:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA21252; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 17:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 'make release' &c. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 1997 09:45:15 +0930."
             <199704090015.JAA21646@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> 
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 1997 17:55:15 -0700
Message-ID: <21248.860547315@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Can we either lose the underscore (bad) or have it become WITHPORTS
> that actually enables the ports (better)?  You can imagine how I felt

I vote for losing the underscore since at least the NOFOO convention
is well understood.  I'm not quite ready for a whole new batch of
WITHFOO variables. :-)

					Jordan