Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Dec 1997 15:38:23 -0800 (PST)
From:      asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To:        mike@smith.net.au
Cc:        sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: why is tcl in base distribution
Message-ID:  <199712172338.PAA05516@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199712172230.JAA01693@word.smith.net.au> (message from Mike Smith on Thu, 18 Dec 1997 09:00:38 %2B1030)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * Because the ports collection strives to be self-contained.  This is a 
 * Very Smart Idea, not the least because if the anti-bloat faction rips 
 * Tcl bleeding from the corpse of the system, the ports will still work.

In case you haven't noticed, tcl has already left -stable.  And both
ports and the system appear to be in extremely good condition, thank
you. :)

Satoshi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712172338.PAA05516>