From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 12 01:06:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 7FAEB1065675; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:06:52 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: bf1783@gmail.com Message-ID: <20111212010652.GA2317@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112110544.pBB5isZ0077815@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111211075324.GA25226@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Brendan Fabeny Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/cppcheck Makefile distinfo ports/devel/cppcheck/files patch-Makefile patch-cli__cmdlineparser.cpp X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:06:52 -0000 On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 04:05:45PM +0000, b. f. wrote: > On 12/11/11, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I understand that this case is special, as manpage gets indeed built and > > taints dependencies with some junk. Maybe you can ask upstream to provide > > precompiled version next time? > > I know it is not the typical use of this variable (although one could > argue that it should be), but as you point out, my rationale for the > change was based on the fact that the manpages here require installing > additional dependencies, which users may wish to avoid. I will ask > upstream to consider supplying a pre-compiled version. Thanks! ./danfe