Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:01:36 -0500 From: Bill Sorenson <instructionset@gmail.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net>, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: future of sparc64 Message-ID: <CACcTwYm-49Nm5WikHR4LvKNOksRQVbBeEnG1rQrf1HWyv8J_Mg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20171010015206.GB31231@lonesome.com> References: <CANCZdfq5=KRp4NYKsc15gyS9C7CxrBFxcKQLPwnb_0oPb15vJw@mail.gmail.com> <20171005234149.GE8557@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <59D6CA6C.1040502@Wilcox-Tech.com> <20171007174124.GA20810@lonesome.com> <be825c73-d524-1d2b-fb42-b4d1e27ccb72@pix.net> <20171010015206.GB31231@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've been able to get GCC 5 and 6 to build as well. I had to build 4.9, use that to build 5 with a full bootstrap disabled and then use that to build itself once more. There is definitely something wrong there. On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 05:32:54PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote: > > I built gcc 6.0.4 (natively) on a sparc64 stable/11 a week ago. > > I guess I'm confused then. It definitely fails on: > > FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Fri Aug 5 2016 root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org > > (I never updated it to 11.0R because I didn't think anything significant > changed between them.) > > I'll try spinning up another machine when I finish my current road trip. > > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACcTwYm-49Nm5WikHR4LvKNOksRQVbBeEnG1rQrf1HWyv8J_Mg>