From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Wed May 6 07:35:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F25138B33 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 07:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49H7gB0NWyz4F2n for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 07:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 0467ZcgA078351 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 May 2020 09:35:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: bhyve win-guest benchmark comparing To: Jason Tubnor , FreeBSD virtualization References: <9e7f4c01-6cd1-4045-1a5b-69c804b3881b@omnilan.de> <20200419172345.Horde.alwm2Bn67wrcUt5a0zVjQ9f@app.eeeit.de> <69553fba-4ee5-67dc-a052-b58bb8100061@netfence.it> <20200420090934.d6gkjg5er5ij36d2@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <93773166-888d-c1cc-007e-d51b432a6d8a@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 09:35:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49H7gB0NWyz4F2n X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.71 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; IP_SCORE(-1.91)[ip: (-8.91), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-4.45), asn: 30722(3.79), country: IT(0.03)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 07:35:51 -0000 On 2020-04-20 12:06, Jason Tubnor wrote: > On Mon., 20 Apr. 2020, 7:09 pm Felix Palmen, wrote: > >> >>> Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already >>> running as fast as possible. Correct? >> >> I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge >> effect. I confirm this made a huge effect on a Xeon E3-1220, while it (obviously) made no difference on a Ryzen 7 2700. I'll try this ASAP on a Core i5-9400 and a Core(TM) i5-7400 :) bye & Thanks av.