Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:14:27 +0100 From: Lars Thegler <lth@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Santoro?= <dereckson@espace-win.org>, perl <perl@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: textproc/p5-ack -> textproc/ack rename Message-ID: <CAO7rfHF0LDLTxO2eADc0KMsFf%2BEBoNzq6wujfUpfq-PY%2Be_ZXw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-d8SokdDNtGnpT_A5k%2BRK=A4b7ohhVqC-ybGj_b3ifTQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKg6iAG8eWvG=OvzVXqrnWyiaOf7RB5Hajf3uUufNsKzpyumiA@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83-d8SokdDNtGnpT_A5k%2BRK=A4b7ohhVqC-ybGj_b3ifTQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/p5-ack-rename.diff > > Anyone objecting should speak up, or I'll commit it :) No objection at all. The p5- prefix is for supporting modules. ack is an application in its own right. And yes, we should gradually move such stuff out from under the prefix. > Chris /Lars
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAO7rfHF0LDLTxO2eADc0KMsFf%2BEBoNzq6wujfUpfq-PY%2Be_ZXw>