Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:08:48 +0000 From: Lewis Thompson <purple@lewiz.net> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Handling port that requires GNU binutils (libiberty, libbfd). Message-ID: <20031117120848.GA14424@lewiz.org> In-Reply-To: <20031116012936.GN59397@k7.mavetju> References: <20031115123307.GA33995@lewiz.org> <20031116012936.GN59397@k7.mavetju>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:29:37PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:33:07PM +0000, Lewis Thompson wrote: > > These are all part of binutils and as such are available in > > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils. However, they are not much > > use to me there. >=20 > You could copy them into your work directory in the post-fetch phase > of the fetch phase of the port. Okay. I see what you're trying to get at but: a) Not everybody has the source installed, and b) Not everybody has it compiled. Does anybody here think it would be acceptable for the port to require the source? That doesn't seem a good idea to me. How would I go about incorporating just libbfd and libiberty into my port? Is it possible? Thanks very much, -lewiz. --=20 I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -| msn:purple@lewiz.net | jabber:lewiz@jabber.org | url:www.lewiz.org |- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/uLpQItq0KFQv7T8RAgEjAJ9p6a9GoGRnttJa1vIQY+J22WQ3WQCg3u78 RuGn7b9doYwJDwZI+2Q1210= =g5hP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031117120848.GA14424>