Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:00:45 -0700 (MST) From: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903021459280.19399-100000@peloton.physics.montana.edu> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > Well, as I understand it, FreeBSD 3.x is still not what's > recommended for production applications. (I'm installing 2.2.8 on > all of the productions machines I bring up.) So does this count? There's a reason we now have 3.1-STABLE. The 2.2.* branch is dead and eventually (probably fairly quickly) ports will stop compiling correctly for the 2.2 branch even if they have the ports updates correctly installed. Brett ****************************************************************** Brett Taylor brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu http://peloton.physics.montana.edu/brett/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903021459280.19399-100000>