From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Nov 30 17:26:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F2FC5D797 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D0E19BB; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8dz-000IPi-D7; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:26:07 +0100 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:26:07 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Kubilay Kocak Cc: CeDeROM , sunpoet@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports , oerg@freebsd.org, Dmitry Sivachenko Subject: Re: [devel/protobuf] upgrade request to 3 Message-ID: <20161130172607.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> References: <922fa900-010b-ae3e-5f97-7dccac0e7eda@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <922fa900-010b-ae3e-5f97-7dccac0e7eda@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:26:07 -0000 Hi! > This probably requires a new port (protobuf30), as it crosses a major > version boundary (2.x -> 3.x) and judging by the presence of separate > protobuf (2.6.x) and protobuf25 port. As far as I studied the issue, a new version is not required. See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212973 But I had no time for a final validation and I'm traveling right now. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !