Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:36:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222692] Source install shows using svn, not svnlite Message-ID: <bug-222692-9-BOWudPayJI@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-222692-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-222692-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222692 Warren Block <wblock@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wblock@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Warren Block <wblock@FreeBSD.org> --- One problem is that the svnlite man pages have never been fixed. They all refer to svn: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D191163 svnlite was an import of an external utility into base. I'm hesitant to add more dependencies on it in the docs, since I suspect it still might go away= .=20 The right way probably to add a note, like we already have in other places.= =20 Each of those has to explain the situation, which only ends up being more confusing. Probably that should all be written in one place so it does not have to be repeated each time. This does not help the new user, because it= 's a lot of information they don't need. "Use svnlite, which is the same as svn, unless it doesn't exist, in which case install the package. Mentally repla= ce all these example commands with one or the other, whichever one exists." --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-222692-9-BOWudPayJI>