Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 09:17:51 +0000 From: "Tom Jones" <thj@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vnet with interfaces Message-ID: <aba8f8f1-70e1-4996-83c2-dfaac2b9464c@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <fMnWyNnZs8GZ-wPxlMzoeUbo-5GinDlYIYHn3yrMyAQ-iM12txadPv5m8ojaA0OOMF4Ys_qiOPyti2vThPVEd7BmT8WH6ofNA6wlLUdRJT0=@enki-multimedia.eu> References: <fMnWyNnZs8GZ-wPxlMzoeUbo-5GinDlYIYHn3yrMyAQ-iM12txadPv5m8ojaA0OOMF4Ys_qiOPyti2vThPVEd7BmT8WH6ofNA6wlLUdRJT0=@enki-multimedia.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, at 18:31, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > How does work VNET with interfaces? Is this as efficient as using pci > passtrough in a vm ? Overhead should be minimal, while the device is logically missing from the default vnet there isn't any more "in the way" for actual usage. Marco's paper might be a good starting point for further digging: https://papers.freebsd.org/2003/zec-vimage/ Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aba8f8f1-70e1-4996-83c2-dfaac2b9464c>