From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 22 8:20:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E5F15495 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 08:20:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from salmon.nlsystems.com (salmon.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.3]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA91144; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:29:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:29:19 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Mike Smith Cc: Warner Losh , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: at_shutdown going away In-Reply-To: <199908211951.MAA00837@dingo.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > In message <199908190737.AAA04137@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: > > : Seriously though, I'm in the process of replacing a number of the > > : ad-hoc event handler callout lists in the kernel (most notably the > > : at_shutdown and apm* lists) with a generic implementation. > > > > Shouldn't the apm stuff use the new-bus hooks? I've migraded a couple > > of uses in pccard to using that now that I have newbus node to hang > > them off of... > > APM is only attached to the ISA bus for crufty reasons; I'm going to > take it off shortly and use the kernel environment to pass it options. APM is attached directly to nexus0 in the device tree. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message