Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Jul 2023 08:15:45 +0100
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@rabson.org>
To:        Daniel Engberg <diizzy@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org,  dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: da411ab69810 - main - sysutils/catatonit: new port
Message-ID:  <CACA0VUioUnqFOYKsbSWSFirf3w_OF7hS7r0Du10p8xkGM0X0Ng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <efb9fa02ad54c4a7878091f146d4c925@pyret.net>
References:  <202307221238.36MCc06w097209@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <efb9fa02ad54c4a7878091f146d4c925@pyret.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000ecb2ca0601224467
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 15:21, Daniel Engberg <diizzy@freebsd.org> wrote:

>
> Why is pre-configure section needed if you use USES= autoreconf ?
> LICENSE seems to be incorrect?
>
> https://github.com/dfr/catatonit/commit/96760cc0acb3643a266505b71d025b484e2c4a98
> (see commit message and README.md)
> Please define LICENSE_FILE
> HAS_CONFIGURE should be GNU_CONFIGURE
> Is gmake really needed? Works fine on 13.2-RELEASE using (b)make
> If you only have two files in pkg-plist you can also define plist in the
> Makefile instead. (optional)
>

Thanks for the feedback. I don't think I even tried to build with bmake - I
guess I assumed that autoconf tends to imply gmake. I'll send you a patch
to fix the license issue and other nits.

 Doug.

--000000000000ecb2ca0601224467
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 15:21, Daniel =
Engberg &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:diizzy@freebsd.org">diizzy@freebsd.org</a>&gt=
; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px=
 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:=
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
Why is pre-configure section needed if you use USES=3D autoreconf ?<br>
LICENSE seems to be incorrect? <br>
<a href=3D"https://github.com/dfr/catatonit/commit/96760cc0acb3643a266505b7=
1d025b484e2c4a98" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/d=
fr/catatonit/commit/96760cc0acb3643a266505b71d025b484e2c4a98</a> <br>
(see commit message and README.md)<br>
Please define LICENSE_FILE<br>
HAS_CONFIGURE should be GNU_CONFIGURE<br>
Is gmake really needed? Works fine on 13.2-RELEASE using (b)make<br>
If you only have two files in pkg-plist you can also define plist in the <b=
r>
Makefile instead. (optional)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks for=
 the feedback. I don&#39;t think I even tried to build with bmake - I guess=
 I assumed that autoconf tends to imply gmake. I&#39;ll send you a patch to=
 fix the license issue and other nits.</div><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0Doug.=
</div></div></div>

--000000000000ecb2ca0601224467--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACA0VUioUnqFOYKsbSWSFirf3w_OF7hS7r0Du10p8xkGM0X0Ng>