From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat May 8 11: 2:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from baerenklau.de.freebsd.org (baerenklau.de.freebsd.org [195.185.195.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4CC150DA for ; Sat, 8 May 1999 11:02:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from w@panke.de.freebsd.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by baerenklau.de.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id UAA19056; Sat, 8 May 1999 20:02:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from w@panke.de.freebsd.org) Received: (from w@localhost) by paula.panke.de.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.8.8) id TAA00589; Sat, 8 May 1999 19:57:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from w) Message-ID: <19990508195717.38777@panke.de.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 19:57:17 +0200 From: Wolfram Schneider To: Bill Fumerola , chris@calldei.com Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: advocacy web pages References: <19990507151909.J1526@holly.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i In-Reply-To: ; from Bill Fumerola on Fri, May 07, 1999 at 12:23:24PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 1999-05-07 12:23:24 -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Fri, 7 May 1999, Chris Costello wrote: > > > Different system. In my opinion, putting advocacy in the CVS > > tree is impractical. There is a CVS tree on > > advocacy.freebsd.org, however. > > Which doesn't help anyone involved with the project. > > There is a reason why we have one repository for ALL projects. I fail to > see why this is different. All of the nifty SGML tools etc etc that exist > for the doc project could be utilized for this project. Agreed. FreeBSD has manpower problem, not a tool problem. The infrastructure is good: SGML tools, source repository, cvsup/ftp/web mirrors, mailing lists etc. What we need are users who did really the work on freefall. -- Wolfram Schneider http://wolfram.schneider.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message