From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun  3 14:25:30 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C5C16A400
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  3 Jun 2007 14:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from slogster@gmail.com)
Received: from smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de
	[139.18.143.252])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F3713C455
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  3 Jun 2007 14:25:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from slogster@gmail.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB3224F;
	Sun,  3 Jun 2007 16:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at studnetz-ul
Received: from smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id JkahF-CLwDbB; Sun,  3 Jun 2007 16:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from a144026.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de
	(a144026.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.144.26])
	by smtp.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F34424D;
	Sun,  3 Jun 2007 16:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Momchil Ivanov <slogster@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:00:22 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <200706031321.39280.idiotbg@gmail.com>
	<20070603132409.GB77981@asgard.home>
	<499c70c0706030627r1eb1596ame08d2ee302e2a517@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706030627r1eb1596ame08d2ee302e2a517@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1798998.0D4iiV1dli";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200706031600.28235.slogster@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver Herold <noerd@daemonical.org>
Subject: Re: what should I set for CPUTYPE in make.conf?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:25:30 -0000

--nextPart1798998.0D4iiV1dli
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 03 June 2007 15:27:58 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> On 6/3/07, Oliver Herold <noerd@daemonical.org> wrote:
> > Nothing at all in my humble opinion. You'll have maybe more problems th=
an
> > advantages because of changing this option.

Can you explain this one, please? What kind of problems am I going to=20
encounter?

>
> Oliver is more expert than I, but _IF_ we will get troubles why do we
> have this option in the first place?

=2D-=20
PGP KeyID: 0x3118168B
Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint BB50 2983 0714 36DC D02E =C2=A0158A E03D 56DA 3118 168B
 =20

--nextPart1798998.0D4iiV1dli
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBGYsl34D1W2jEYFosRAgaMAKDExyivO2UO16X+lTU0kIIIXooncACgqXm8
WoILAw8vWS4F7+hw3ySLxrU=
=ZVch
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1798998.0D4iiV1dli--