From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 15 04:40:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6DB16A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 04:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.fillmore-labs.com (lima.fillmore-labs.com [62.138.193.83])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A480643F75
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 04:40:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com)
Received: from pd958ad9e.dip.t-dialin.net
	([217.88.173.158] helo=fillmore-labs.com ident=yn3y3o732pea3dnb)
	by mx2.fillmore-labs.com with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9)
	id 1AKzio-000BkB-1d; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:40:14 +0100
Message-ID: <3FB61EAB.7060907@fillmore-labs.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:40:11 +0100
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Kranzel <adam@blacktabby.org>
References: <200311150411.15118.adam@blacktabby.org>
In-Reply-To: <200311150411.15118.adam@blacktabby.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-Sender: eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9
Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH  <http://www.fillmore-labs.com/>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@fillmore-labs.com
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Question about using PORTREVISION vs. DISTFILES
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:40:18 -0000

Adam Kranzel wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I've got a small patch for the audio/easytag port, which adds a few bugfix 
> patches from the author.  The software is at version 0.30c once the patches 
> are applied, but the tarball is still version 0.30. Would it be more correct 
> to leave PORTVERSION at 0.30 and set PORTREVISION = 1, or to set PORTVERSION 
> = 0.30c and use DISTFILES to have it fetch the tarball properly?

If you do

DISTFILES=	easytag-0.30.tar.bz2
PATCHFILES=	patch_easytag_030_030a.diff \
		patch_easytag_030a_030b.diff \
		patch_easytag_030b_030c.diff
    
then make the PORTVERSION 0.30c.
It should be essentially equivalent to easytag-0.30c.tar.bz2.