From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 12 09:59:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B2D16A4BF
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAD143FF7
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[66.30.200.37])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <20030912165903015003d5m5e>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:59:04 +0000
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37]
	(may be forged))
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8CGwxCo065930;
	Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:58:59 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: (from lowell@localhost)
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h8CGwwZS065927;
	Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to
	freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f
Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com
To: jesse@wingnet.net
References: <bjqs64$6i9$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20030911231742.GA61528@dan.emsphone.com> <bjsjdd$vgh$2@sea.gmane.org>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Date: 12 Sep 2003 12:58:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <bjsjdd$vgh$2@sea.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <44znharlil.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 38
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: `top` process memory usage: SIZE vs RES
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:59:08 -0000

Jesse Guardiani <jesse@wingnet.net> writes:

> Dan Nelson wrote:
> 
> > In the last episode (Sep 11), Jesse Guardiani said:
> >> 1.) Where is my Free memory going? I can't account for it
> >>     in the SIZE and RES columns of the various processes.
> >>     These are relatively constant.
> > 
> > Disk cache.
> 
> I thought it might be something like that. My large test
> messages are being written to disk over and over and over
> as the message travels down the pipline. Makes a great case
> for installing a RAM disk. :)

No, probably not.  The OS disk-caching is probably *more* efficient
than letting the data go into a RAM disk at each stage.  Considerably
so, in fact.  

> >  
> >> 2.) What, exactly, is RES? `man top` describes it as this:
> >>     "RES is the current amount of resident memory", but does
> >>     that mean RES is included in SIZE? Or does that mean that
> >>     RES should be counted in addition to SIZE?
> > 
> > RES the amount of SIZE that it currently in core
> 
> OK. To clarify, you mean core kernel memory here?

No, it's not in kernel space.  "Core" just refers to RAM:  the term is
held over from the days when main memory was constructed out of little
magnetic cores in a wire matrix.

> If so, how is that significant? Why should I care?

If your system starts swapping heavily, that will often be the clue
that tells you why.  Just one example.