Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:51:16 -0400 From: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net> To: Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> Cc: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>, Frerich Raabe <raabe@kde.org>, kde@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Building kdebase3: forcing kdelibs to be built first. Message-ID: <20020802165116.GA11625@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0208021129110.24562-100000@xena.gsicomp.on.ca> References: <3D4A9055.3010201@gmx.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0208021129110.24562-100000@xena.gsicomp.on.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:31:35AM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: >On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >> Afterthought: But even with revision-bumps we can't really make sure >> people compile kdelibs _first_. Is there a solution to this (apart from >> merging kdelibs and kdebase into one big port)? > >Isn't this what BUILD_DEPENDS is for? Yes and no. BUILD_DEPENEDS means it doesn't have to be present at runtime. We need LIB_DEPENDS in this case. I may end up adding kdelibs to the kde3 metaport. That should force the issue to a conclusion, as it would enable both make (with some dependency reordering) and portupgrade to Do The Right Thing(tm). -- AlanE KDE-FreeBSD Team To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020802165116.GA11625>