Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:26:03 +1100 From: Antony Mawer <ajmawer@optusnet.com.au> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -STABLE was stable for long time (Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS?) Message-ID: <3DD85DCB.7020300@optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20021117224133.A23359-100000@hub.org> References: <20021117224133.A23359-100000@hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Actually, it might not make complete sense ... but if 100 committers make > 100 changes to the server, and it isn't until -RELEASE that anyone puts > any *real* load onto it and it breaks ... which of those 100 changes might > have caused that problem? > > If ppl like me take snapshots periodically of STABLE and pound the hell > out of it in a real life scenario, then the bugs don't get a chance to > pile up ... the overall system *would* stay stable ... Out of interest, has there been any attempt at running Bonsai or a similar CVS checkin tracking tool for the FreeBSD repository? It'd make trying to track down "this change went in on date X, affecting files A, B, C and D, and was checked in by Z"-type things much easier. I've run Bonsai myself and it's incredibly useful for such things. Is there an equivalent system running for FreeBSD? -Antony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DD85DCB.7020300>