From owner-freebsd-net Tue Mar 11 11:52:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9272837B401 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:52:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from migla.ktu.lt (migla.ktu.lt [193.219.160.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB97543F85 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:52:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from device@migla.ktu.lt) Received: by migla.ktu.lt (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 3106F1148A; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:52:47 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:52:47 +0200 From: Nerijus Bendziunas To: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird ipnat behaviour Message-ID: <20030311195247.GA16358@migla.ktu.lt> References: <20030310220509.D60582@inton.Ninja-assassin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030310220509.D60582@inton.Ninja-assassin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, Maybe you dont set gateway_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf ot sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:09:13PM -0800, Static wrote: > PITA# ipnat -l > List of active MAP/Redirect filters: > map tun0 192.168.1.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/32 > map tun0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 192.168.1.0/24 proxy port 21 ftp/ip > rdr tun0 0.0.0.0/0 port 0- 16 -> 192.168.1.20 port 80 tcp > > List of active sessions: > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message