From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 16:36:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A19A16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:36:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14107.mail.yahoo.com (web14107.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCAE243D31 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:36:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cguttesen@yahoo.dk) Received: (qmail 63814 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Nov 2004 16:36:15 -0000 Message-ID: <20041119163615.63809.qmail@web14107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.248.174.50] by web14107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:36:15 CET Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:36:15 +0100 (CET) From: Claus Guttesen To: Palle Girgensohn , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Dell 2850 & amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:36:16 -0000 > The machine shall be a general utility system, > running email (cyrus) and > web (apache), postgresql and php, some simple java > (tomcat). > Before I build all ports needed, is there anything I > need to set to make > the ports build 64 bit? All I've done now is to get > the kernel built in > 64-bit mode. Is that enough to make all ports built > in 64 bit? Shall I set > CPUTYPE to something? The CPUs are two Xeon, is that > p4? I omitted CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf. Other than that, you just have to check CPUTYPE in a shell. > Is it even wise to use amd64? Is it stable enough? > Docs say so, but > browsning this list gives me second thoughts? I have a 2850 running postgresql, sometimes heavily loaded, but works like a charm besides that. There is a description on how to get java working on this list (as far as I remember). > Perhaps this is all FAQ and RTFM, but I've searched > the net a bit about > this, couldn't find the right answers. Sorry, I'm > still a newbie in > AMD64-land. :)= The amd-port appears to be slightly faster than it's i386-cousin on same hardware. Claus