From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Jan 10 13:32:48 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A1DE9A880; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71C274C64; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 19F186364; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:32:47 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Ryan Steinmetz Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r458567 - head/net/isc-dhcp43-server Message-ID: <20180110133247.GA71304@FreeBSD.org> References: <201801092037.w09KbI47089507@repo.freebsd.org> <20180110115836.GA74771@FreeBSD.org> <20180110132830.GA85907@exodus.zi0r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180110132830.GA85907@exodus.zi0r.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:32:49 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 08:28:30AM -0500, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > On (01/10/18 11:58), Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > ... > > Something I've always been wondering about: why do we have both > > isc-dhcp43-* and isc-dhcp44-* ports in the tree? What is the > > difference between the two? Which one should be the preferred, > > default one? > > Historically, ISC has had multiple supported 'stable' versions of > isc-dhcpd. In this particular case, 4.4.x is an upcoming release and > the current version is a beta. > > Enterprises will typically stick with a particular stable release until > something compels them to go through the potential hassle/risk of > switching. > > At the moment, the isc-dhcp43-* would be considered preferred. Thanks. It would be nice if this information could be found in the ports' descriptions though. :-) ./danfe