Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 15:30:00 GMT From: Barbara Guida <barbara.freebsd@gmail.com> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/175776: patching x11-servers/xorg-server fails Message-ID: <201302021530.r12FU0Ww098380@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/175776; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Barbara Guida <barbara.freebsd@gmail.com>
To: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>
Cc: Tsurutani Naoki <turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp>,
freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/175776: patching x11-servers/xorg-server fails
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:25:41 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Niclas Zeising wrote:
> On 02/02/13 13:52, Tsurutani Naoki wrote:
>> xorg-server-1.10.6_2,1 xorg-vfbserver-1.10.6_1,1 are installed.
>> All the Xorg related ports are installed after setting
>> "WITH_NEW_XORG=1".
>>
>> Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/02/13 13:09, Tsurutani Naoki wrote:
>>>> Thank you for your reply.
>>>>
>>>> Both files on my host are just same with that on SVN
>>>> repository you pointed. I think only
>>>> "files/extra-new-arch-i386" is used with "WITH_NEW_XORG=1".
>>>> The file "hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h" made by "make
>>>> extract" differs from the one expeced by the patch file (see
>>>> line 1335 and 1371). Is there anything wrong on my host or on
>>>> my thought ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Only extra-new-arch-i386 is used when compiling with
>>> WITH_NEW_XORG. Both patches fixes the same issue, but in
>>> different versions of xorg-server, the old and the new. Which
>>> version of xorg-server are getting built? Is it the correct
>>> one? As I previously said, I can't reproduce this issue, and
>>> I've been running builds for different freebsd versions of i386
>>> both with old and new xorg during the night without problems.
>>> Regards! -- Niclas Zeising
>>>
>>
>
> Hi! I finally managed to reproduce this, and a patch is in the
> works. Can you please try the attached patch? Remember to apply
> it with patch -E to remove empty files. Regards!
>
It seems that extra-arch-i386 from (1) is missing, it's not created by
the patch.
(1) @ line #13 of new patch
+EXTRA_PATCHES+= ${FILESDIR}/extra-arch-i386
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRDS/1AAoJECfdb9Y99fdQrfQH/RZc5WaV+tM7Cvv7eWMrrF3k
hEQKpw+DN8G0p5jPzRploAnSM9o8EcWZG+Uwmk4Aabty2bEx/20s4hVfL/H+FVap
hTnyTSpe0lI2sewK1ZizIMmvx5HPIIWxEcCY+69tLs4HxtMPR5IyIvfzJCCfsIcV
N4dJOnusEnHPhbUlDU2cLlz1xN3rN0hSJXJUbM1uf5MmM7Q0sklg3lAODDlGCcNq
hKVwqBD+9CXsv8WmSotrK0lvzd2jDwh5TVZKys9npocS+A7fbEujNU1cJl64nB4t
sGCozNNvI0tBcS6su2ZV4oswWmXKqbK+2xAOZd4JrDeA8/eYCJXO4UGG5npm41Q=
=7aYC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201302021530.r12FU0Ww098380>