From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jul 10 10:37:41 1995 Return-Path: security-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA16524 for security-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:37:41 -0700 Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA16518 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:37:38 -0700 Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <30731>; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:38:55 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:38:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: "Michael J. Caughey" cc: "Michael J. Caughey" , Paul Traina , Pete Kruckenberg , Julian Howard Stacey , security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Byet April 95 no ref to screennd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 10 Jul 1995, Michael J. Caughey wrote: > I can see what your trying to say. I don't want to get into a heated flame war > here, so let me explain myself. I simply asked if I could purchase the Product from > him, Paul Vixie, and he said he could not legally do so. I never mentioned "legally > validate its security". He said, his hands were tied legally to sell it. When I > tried to set up some kind of support plan with him he said, no problem. Then said he > wasn't sure if he could legally do that. Of course this wasn't definate, but it was > left to that about three weeks ago and I have yet to here from him. I started talking > with him about three or four weeks pirior to that. What does this have to do with the security of the screend? That is just a licensing problem with DEC (who by the way includes screend with Ultrix and OSF). Tom