From owner-cvs-ports Fri Jun 13 19:36:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA04978 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 19:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.dialix.com.au (spinner.dialix.com.au [192.203.228.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA04971; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 19:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.dialix.com.au (localhost.dialix.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.dialix.com.au with ESMTP id KAA08630; Sat, 14 Jun 1997 10:35:24 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199706140235.KAA08630@spinner.dialix.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= cc: James FitzGibbon , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/db - Imported sources In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Jun 1997 22:46:43 +0400." Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 10:35:23 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, James FitzGibbon wrote: > > > Log Message: > > Import of Berkely DB 2.0 > > Why not import it in libc instead? (contrib version will be better) Because: 1) It's not API compatable with the current version in libc 2) It's not compatable with the current .db file format 3) The author[s] explicitly reccomend *against* putting it in libc 4) It's got commercial use license restrictions if I remember correctly While I think it's great software, I'm not sure that it's libc material.. Cheers, -Peter