From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 07:11:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E501CD0E for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 07:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DCECF5 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 07:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t337BRRd076634 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 00:11:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <551E3D1E.3070501@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 00:11:26 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tap(4): will it be more reasonable if it preserved UP/DOWN state, when closed? References: <551B3021.4050206@rawbw.com> <551BC4D5.9010006@quip.cz> <551C780F.4050202@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <551C780F.4050202@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:11:35 -0000 On 04/01/2015 15:58, Yuri wrote: > > I am going to create the corresponding net.link.tap.down_on_close. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199136