From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 01:05:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E202816A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:05:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8770143D31 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:05:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1F15MZD079549; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1F15Lq5079548; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:21 -0500 From: David Schultz To: Andrew MacIntyre , Jason Henson , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20050215010521.GA79529@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew MacIntyre , Jason Henson , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <1108277558l.86500l.0l@BARTON> <20050213082128.GA68307@VARK.MIT.EDU> <42108243.9030800@bullseye.apana.org.au> <20050214130450.GA55300@VARK.MIT.EDU> <20050214220807.GF40468@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050214220807.GF40468@funkthat.com> Subject: Re: malloc vs ptmalloc2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:05:39 -0000 On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > David Schultz wrote this message on Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 08:04 -0500: > > Right, databases, language runtimes, and the small set of other > > applications for which it really matters usually have their own > > special-purpose allocators. I was counting on that when I said > > that replacing malloc() is unlikely to make a big difference. > > (One could argue, of course, that it's unfortunate that > > applications need to do so.) > > Hmmm, maybe we should bring the zone API into userland? :) It'd be > nice to have some of the features, like the ctor/dtor's... That's essentially what Solaris did: http://www.usenix.org/event/usenix01/bonwick.html