From owner-freebsd-audit  Fri Jun 22  3:26:59 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org
Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F285E37B401; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@trang.nuxi.com [206.40.252.115])
	by relay.nuxi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5MAQuR14279;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2001 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f5MAQur00672;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2001 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 03:26:55 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Cc: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>, Mike Barcroft <mike@q9media.com>,
	freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: whois(1) patch
Message-ID: <20010622032655.A599@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <XFMail.20010531182606.mheffner@novacoxmail.com> <p05100e0cb73f7fa476a3@[128.113.24.47]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <p05100e0cb73f7fa476a3@[128.113.24.47]>; from drosih@rpi.edu on Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:50:46AM -0400
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-audit.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-audit>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-audit>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:50:46AM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> It is not likely that there will be a specific sweep to get rid
> of _P() and to ansi-ify routine declarations.

I strongly think you are wrong.  Many of us are talking of doing a sweep.
But in a controlled consistent manner.

> However, the
> consensus is that if you are going to be changing the declarations
> in some module for OTHER reasons, then you might want to ansi-ify.

I would say "consensus" as much as tolerated.


> If you're going to ansi-ify, then you should ansi-ify the whole
> source file, instead of mixing styles.

Yet another reason to just leave things as-is until a sweep is done.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message