Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:      John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Cc:        rizzo@icir.org
Subject:   Re: realtime problem
Message-ID:  <200304091916.h39JGZ2x064053@strings.polstra.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030409121408.A23344@xorpc.icir.org>
References:  <20030409114957.GN83126@cicely9.cicely.de> <20030409144042.B901@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <200304091900.h39J0igT063938@strings.polstra.com> <20030409121408.A23344@xorpc.icir.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20030409121408.A23344@xorpc.icir.org>,
Luigi Rizzo  <rizzo@icir.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 12:00:44PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> ...
> > Huh?  I'm not aware of any hz-related botches in the mii code.
> > Could you give me a specific example?  I'd like to fix it if I can
> > find it.
> 
> it is not hz-related, the fact is that some PHY events are
> handled by busy-waiting in the interrupt service routine
> thus causing unpredictable latencies in the response to
> interrupts.

Ah, I get it now.  Thanks for the clarification!

John



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304091916.h39JGZ2x064053>