From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 08:58:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F90C1065673 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mah@jump-ing.de) Received: from mail.ud03.udmedia.de (ud03.udmedia.de [194.117.254.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96B98FC1A for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:58:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mah@jump-ing.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; q=dns/txt; s= beta; bh=sTbfxHZh7qcB2XgibPPlkg4D5cp5/U00/wqPWGXNqYk=; b=Jt+Gl9W eFtgZ/iWMXwe4sD6pyjX6Dn+kiKKNlu/yfajq0xdAs27h0X1hL685X+dEapTGSyt AN7bLBuC153ACm5JnAzklLaoGSF9qyaa69/kfuvHHJNls/UrYdg+dSX3b5wFTr/v ocee5ouqTbhp3xwCC0H+grVILKbU5A2HYOKo= Received: (qmail 20564 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2008 09:58:51 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.50?) (ud03?291p1@82.212.11.84) by mail.ud03.udmedia.de with ESMTPA; 18 Dec 2008 09:58:51 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <20081216191305.GA19656@psconsult.nl> References: <5CED6A5A-C532-4042-B7F3-264BD0C9791B@jump-ing.de> <20081216191305.GA19656@psconsult.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Markus Hitter Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:58:53 +0100 To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Subject: Re: Wake-on-lan packages don't get through X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:58:54 -0000 Am 16.12.2008 um 20:13 schrieb Paul Schenkeveld: > On some of my machines I need to explicitely send the packet to the > IP LAN broadcast address, e.g. 192.168.1.255 (assuming /24 netmask). This did the trick, finally. Those checksums reported as being bad were obviously a red herring. Thanks for helping, MarKus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/