From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jun 26  9:48:25 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from easeway.com (ns1.easeway.com [209.69.39.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE82B14FE5
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mwlucas@easeway.com)
Received: (from mwlucas@localhost)
	by easeway.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id MAA15501;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:35:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199906261635.MAA15501@easeway.com>
Subject: Re: tunefs: /dev/rwd0s1e: reload: Invalid argument
In-Reply-To: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB44011059FB@site2s1> from Christopher Michaels at "Jun 26, 99 12:15:33 pm"
To: ChrisMic@clientlogic.com (Christopher Michaels)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:35:21 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: mwlucas@exceptionet.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: mwlucas@exceptionet.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I got the exact same error, on the 2 machines I've enabled softupdates.
> Upon rebooting softupdates in enabled and I can actually tell the
> difference.
> 
> SO.. I personally wouldn't worry about it.
> 
> To verify that softupdates is working, after you reboot, just type 'mount'.
> It'll list softupdates for the partitions, if they are enabled.

Oh, it tells me that softupdates is enabled.  I'm not worried about that,
I'm worried about discovering a heretofore-unknown softupdates bug that
will slowly munch my data.  ;)

If it's not affecting other people, however, I won't worry about it.

Thanks,
==ml
-- 
Michael Lucas			|
Exceptionet, Inc.		|	www.exceptionet.com
"Exceptional Networking"	|


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message