From owner-freebsd-net Tue Feb 6 2:12:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B3537B401; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 02:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f16AC9X37187; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 02:12:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200102061012.f16AC9X37187@iguana.aciri.org> Subject: Re: Almost fixed (was Re: BRIDGE breaks ARP? (Julian's patch)) In-Reply-To: <20010206044513.83942.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu> from Rich Wales at "Feb 5, 2001 9:28:58 pm" To: richw@webcom.com (Rich Wales) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 02:12:09 -0800 (PST) Cc: rizzo@aciri.org, julian@elischer.org, patrick@netzuno.com, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I just noticed something else weird. > > I did "arp -a" on my bridge, and one of the entries was for the bridge > itself. > > In other words, the bridge had an ARP entry telling it its own hardware > address (on its external, "xl0" interface, in case it matters). > The superfluous ARP entry was marked as permanent, FWIW. it is not related to bridging -- i have seen this over time on many FreeBSD systems even without bridging. I do not know how the entry gets installed or deleted. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message