From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 2 21:07:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6480916A4CE; Mon, 2 May 2005 21:07:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.nextrials.com (shiva.nextrials.com [64.81.74.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027E643D69; Mon, 2 May 2005 21:07:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dannyman@toldme.com) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (mito.sr.nextrials.com [192.168.1.102]) by shiva.nextrials.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4E83C2872; Mon, 2 May 2005 14:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4276969D.1030800@toldme.com> Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 14:07:41 -0700 From: Danny Howard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050418) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guy Helmer References: <426D481D.7080502@palisadesys.com> <426DB02B.4050807@FreeBSD.org> <20050426092631.GA50783@stack.nl> <426FE073.4000102@palisadesys.com> In-Reply-To: <426FE073.4000102@palisadesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Marc Olzheim cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org cc: Ade Lovett Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3p6-5.4RC3, Supermicro X6DHR-8G,Dual3.6GHzXeons,Adaptec aic7902 SCSI interface doesn't work in UP kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 21:07:49 -0000 Guy Helmer wrote: > > > These new Supermicro X6DHR-8G 800MHz FSB systems seem to be working OK > (even under load) when running a kernel with SMP enabled. I offered > my configuration in case jhb or someone else would be interested in > what seems to be an interrupt routing problem. Guy, I LOVE YOU, dude! I had ... well, let us just say, some frustration with a new system with this mobo until I read your post that the SMP kernel works. Which is funny, because SMP is turned off, by default, because of some stability issues on one-proc hyperthreaded machines! On the other hand, the non-SMP craps itself spectacularly on at least one multi-proc machine!? I just wish I had read your post last week, and not started with such silliness on a Monday. :) Thanks a bunch, to all who have puzzled over these things before me! Sincerely, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/